Some thoughts about photography critique

Published by

on

Sometimes I like to rewrite and republish posts from the past that did not get a lot of views or attention.

This is one, about a photographers’ favorite: critique. On a previous post, I wrote tips about how a photographer can ask for critique and be more likely to receive meaningful feedback. 

Although critique is fundamental to becoming a better photographer, it is important to keep in mind that constantly letting others tell you what to do and how to do it may not be desirable.  

WHY, and WHEN, ASK FOR INPUT?

You seek critique when you want insight into how others perceive your work. It’s similar to asking someone to read something you’ve written—while you know exactly what you’re trying to say, a reader might not interpret it the same way. If they’re confused, you revise and ask again, “Does this version make more sense?”

In photography, others might notice details you overlooked. For instance, not long ago, an aspiring wedding photographer shared a proposal photo in a critique group. What stood out immediately to me was a trashcan awkwardly positioned behind one of the subjects’ heads. The photographer needed quite a bit of feedback before they even noticed it—bright red and all. That’s why getting multiple perspectives can be so valuable, especially when you’re starting out and trying to break into the field. On the flip side, if you’re an experienced photographer, confidence in your skills might blind you to flaws others can easily spot.

That said, there are also valid reasons not to seek critique. Which leads to the next question.

WHEN is it NOT appropriate to ASK FOR INPUT?    

There are times—especially in the creative process—when seeking feedback isn’t actually helpful. Having a clear vision for a photograph or a series means you already know exactly how you want the final result to look. Once it’s complete, you ask yourself: “Does this match my vision?” If the answer is yes, you keep it. If not, you rework it. When staying fully aligned with your personal vision is your priority, then your own judgment is the only critique that really matters.

But how can critique get in the way of that vision? Constantly asking for feedback can lead to confusion. For instance, I once shared a main photo online and someone suggested I add grain. Because the suggestion was now in my head, I felt compelled to test it out—even though grain had nothing to do with my original idea. Their comment made me second-guess myself. This kind of thing isn’t catastrophic, of course, but repeated often enough, it can dilute your creative instincts.

That’s why some photographers avoid looking at other people’s work and deliberately don’t seek critique. Blocking out outside influence can help sharpen your own vision quickly and make it easier to stay completely true to it.

THE ROLE OF MENTORSHIP

Working with a mentor you respect and trust is one of the most effective ways to grow as a photographer through meaningful critique—without having to sift through unhelpful feedback from people who either lack expertise or disregard your artistic vision. A formal student-teacher relationship also puts you in a better mindset to thoughtfully engage with the guidance you receive. That said, finding the right mentor can be challenging. It needs to be someone who supports the development of your unique style and vision, not someone who simply wants you to imitate theirs.

WHERE DO I STAND?

When someone comments on my artistic work—whether I asked for it or not—I can’t help but take it into account. I ask myself, “Does this person have a valid point?” I do my best not to feel discouraged, and if I agree with the critique and it’s something I can adjust in the photo, I’ll make the change. That said, I rarely seek out feedback. Too much outside input tends to overwhelm me, and I sometimes end up abandoning a project or photo because I lose focus and inspiration.

In contrast, when it comes to the professional side of photography, I’m much more open to feedback. Back in 2020, I considered pursuing food photography and enrolled in a workshop. I shared every image I created in the course forum and followed the instructor’s advice closely. At times, it was disheartening—not getting full approval made me doubt myself—but over time, I noticed fewer corrections and started feeling more confident. Although I eventually decided not to pursue food photography, the critique I received in that setting taught me valuable lessons I now apply across different areas of photography.

If you’re a photographer or visual artist, how do you handle feedback? Do you find that it enhances your work—or does it interfere with your creative vision?

ABOUT THE LEAD PHOTOGRAPH

The lead photograph features a wilting sunflower on a white texture.

Wilting sunflower. This image is available for purchase at my GeoGalleries collection “Summer“.

If you are not familiar with adding texture to your photos, and would like to learn more about it, watch How To Apply Textures In Photoshop 2020, by fellow photographer Howard Grill. If you would like to see how the FEATURED IMAGE was made, click on this link.

______________________________

Wall Art Botanical Images

Wall Art Photography projects

Wall Art landscapes and miscellaneous

________________________________

14 responses to “Some thoughts about photography critique”

  1. Steve Schwartzman Avatar

    I may have mentioned to you that I’m not a fan of imposing a texture, which strike me as an unnecessary extraneous element. There was a time on WordPress maybe 10–12 years ago when adding textures seemed almost a fad among certain bloggers, one that now seems largely to have faded away (or else I just don’t see those blogs any more).

    At the same time, I recognize that many photographers find value in adding textures, so I’ll ask you what benefit you found in adding a texture to the sunflower photograph, and why you chose the particular texture you did.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      I actually do not apply textures to my images very often, although I did a couple of years ago to a series of sunflower pictures on white background (the featured image is part of that series_. I believe that a texture adds some interest to a plain white background, and sometimes help color photographs to appear painterly. This particular texture is from a rock, and I liked it because it has very subtle lines several of which point to the composed photo of the flower, like leading lines. But I agree, it’s mostly a personal preference and drives us away from the real of photography into the realm of digital imagery…

      Like

  2. shoreacres Avatar

    Your distinction between photography and digital imagery is one I hadn’t consciously thought of. It seems a useful way for me to begin to think about my own favorable or not so favorable responses to certain images.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      the boundary between digital image and photograph can become blurry, but applying a texture is pretty obvious.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. shoreacres Avatar

        I agree that a well-done addition of texture can be useful in images with white backgrounds particularly. I prefer a range from subtle to unbelievably subtle, but it still can work.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. moodywarlock Avatar

    I won’t offer any comment unless someone asks. I think constructive criticism is useful when welcomed but it can often fall into negative criticism and a game of ego. Only today I made a photographic mistake as I was rushing, so I wouldn’t judge another harshly.

    I think that the ego game is what puts me off hanging with other photographers. I don’t seek criticism though others have freely given it unasked. But I have developed a tougher skin after selling gallery work and having others judge. I tend to be amused by harsh criticism rather than hurt.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      It’s important to detach emotionally from he photos when people criticize we so we don’t it personally.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. moodywarlock Avatar

        Yes, very true. Detaching the ego is important. I think people often fall into the trap of identifying too strongly with their art as representative of everything they are. In reality, every photo is a small step on a journey. It’s the entirety of the journey that truly matters, not a single step/photo.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. tierneycreates: a fusion of textiles and smiles Avatar

    That photograph is so amazing! I agree with MoodyWarlock’s comments below that is how I approach feedback to a fellow quilter and seeking it for myself.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      Yeah, I also try to give opinion only when asked.

      Liked by 2 people

    2. moodywarlock Avatar

      Agreed! I would also imagine that every completed quilt piece is just a small part of the journey, so it is a fraction of the whole. All that matters is being on that journey ourselves 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  5. indianeskitchen Avatar

    I don’t have your knowledge of photography so I would never comment. I am sincerely serious when I say I can’t stop looking at your pictures. Every image I have seen is so stunning. You have such a gift Alessandra!

    Like

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      Thank you very much, I appreciate your input.

      Like

  6. howg2211 Avatar
    howg2211

    Thanks so much for the shout out Alessandra!

    Like

Leave a comment

Discover more from It is all about the light

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading