Four reasons to stop participating in juried arts shows

Published by

on

These days I seldom submit my work to juried arts shows. When I do so, I follow a few guidelines: it must be local, it must cost less than U$15, and it must be a gallery or organization I want to support. These guidelines are new. After flushing a considerable amount of money into juried arts shows for a couple of years, I have concluded that the frequent rejections, low exposure to potential collectors and low sales potential are not worth it for me.

Below are a few reasons I now seldom submit to juried arts shows:

Reason : Costs

One of the main reasons why entering juried exhibitions can be harmful is the substantial cost associated with submission fees and the preparation of artwork. Although entering one or two juried contests every year will not break the bank, the costs of doing it frequently add up: printing, framing, then shipping or driving the art to and from location. Juried art exhibits vary in price. Low-cost or local, from local art organizations, community galleries, or smaller-scale juried exhibitions typically charge ranging $15 to $50 to submit up to five pieces. Mid-range, regional or national, often hosted by established art institutions or organizations, may charge entry fees in the range of $50 to $100 for up to five images. Prestigious juried exhibitions with a global reach or significant art prizes can range from $100 to several hundred dollars per artwork, or even more.

Reason : Discouragement and loss of artistic freedom

Juried exhibits can be highly competitive, with a limited number of artists accepted out of a large pool of applicants. This can result in a sense of rejection and frustration for artists who are repeatedly denied entry. Constant rejection can erode an artist’s confidence and motivation, affecting his overall creativity and output.This may even lead some artists to question their abilities and whether they should continue pursuing a career in art.

Juried exhibits often require artists to adhere to specific themes, guidelines, or artistic styles determined by the jurors or curators. This can stifle an artist’s creative freedom, and compromise her authenticity and originality.

Reason : The promise of exposure often fails to deliver

The art market can be unpredictable, and acceptance into juried exhibits does not guarantee increased sales or market success. For the most part, those attending juried arts shows are artist themselves, and artists want to sell, not to buy, art. One may invest significant time and energy into preparing for these exhibitions, only to find that they do not lead to significant sales or a broader client base.

After carefully monitoring my website during the exhibits I was accepted into, I have noticed that the number of website visits and sales did not increase. One should be careful and not assume, or believe without evidence, that collectors will be interested in checking out the artist’s website just because her piece is on display at a gallery for a limited number of days

Reason : Art contests offer false validation

Art, as they say, lies in the eye of the beholder; it’s subjective. There are only two people an artist needs to please: herself and her collectors. The judges in art contests, and the other artist who keep tab on who won what, are unlikely to purchase any of the winning art pieces. And the public often does not either, unless it’s art they connect with. And to connect with a piece of art, one does not need to see a ribbon on it within he context of a juried show.

Winning in art contests doesn’t validate the artist’s talent. Instead, these contests often capitalize on the artist’s ego, and yearning for validation. To me, genuine validation stems from those who value an art piece enough to buy it.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, while juried exhibits promise exposure and recognition, artists and art businesses must carefully weigh the potential downsides. The financial costs, emotional toll of repeated rejections, creative constraints, and uncertain returns on investment can make participating in these exhibitions a risky proposition for artists’ business. It is essential for artists to consider their individual circumstances and long-term goals when deciding whether to enter juried exhibits and to explore alternative avenues for building their careers in the art world.

The FEATURED IMAGE is my attempt to use AI to create an image with prompts 😅. It first appeared on this blog on 2023/01/20 in an article about Artificial Intelligence and stock photography.

______________________________

Wall Art Botanical Images

Wall Art Photography projects

Wall Art landscapes and miscellaneous

________________________________

18 responses to “Four reasons to stop participating in juried arts shows”

  1. Anne Sandler Avatar

    I agree Alessandra. I entered one show. Two of my entries got accepted to be on the wall. One made it to the final table, but wasn’t chosen because another one was liked better. Mine was in the macro division and I didn’t think the winner was a macro.

    Following that larger show, I entered a small county fair and won many ribbons! The money? I won $12 which paid for the entries.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      I consider it a good deal when I sell a print and that pays for the entry fee, printing, framing, and a little of my time.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Steve Schwartzman Avatar

    You’ve described the situation well.
    When I see the winning pictures in a contest, I often think to myself: well, those are pictures that a particular judge liked. A different judge might have chosen quite differently. At the same time, I recognize that, as in all fields of human endeavor, there’s always something that’s trendy, and a picture that flies in the face of that trendiness is likely to get rejected.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      One of the reasons an image might get rejected in favor of another is cohesiveness among the chosen images. Either way, unless one has an extraordinary unrepeatable image, it’s often a waste of money, trying to get in or thinking one might benefit a lot from getting in.

      Like

  3. Mark Wade Avatar

    Excellent points Alessandra. Understanding that supporting a competition to further interest in photography is about the only true benefit. The rest is luck of the draw, or, who you may know.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      Some people get a kick and a direct reward in competing. I find it expensive and pointless. Oh well.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. howg2211 Avatar
    howg2211

    I can’t say I disagree. Over the years I’ve managed to get my work into a couple of photo magazines and into Photo Place Gallery in Vermont but, as you say, never sold a piece or had increase web visits because of that. The only juried art shows in which I have had people make a purchase are local ones put on by our local art society. I’m fine paying 15-25 dollar entry fees to support them with a small chance someone will make a purchase.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      Photo Place was thought having to donate the photo after paying for the print because it was more expensive to ship it back home. No more!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. howg2211 Avatar
        howg2211

        I do sometimes wonder if it’s just a money making racket.

        Like

      2. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

        Certainly not for the artist! Locally at least it serves the purpose of networking. But the fact that most of us attending show openings are also artists, and our friends and family who come to support us and buy nothing, makes it financially worth considering participating less.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. howg2211 Avatar
        howg2211

        I meant money making for the gallery 🙂

        Like

      4. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

        I know. I agree! It is! I’ve noticed on entrythingy that some galleries seem to run on contests! It’s certainly the case of photo place. A.

        Like

  5. Emily-Rose Alcock Art Avatar

    Very helpful post thank you ☺️

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      I’m glad you liked it, thanks for commenting.

      Like

  6. tierneycreates: a fusion of textiles and smiles Avatar

    This is good advice. I’ve been in a couple juried art shows and in addition to the entry fee I had are large expense to mail my art and then pre-pay the return postage that they required. I’ve also done several entry fees where I didn’t get selected and have lost like $100.
    It’s funny the entry that paid off the most (the City of Seattle who ended up giving me a solo show and buying 4 of my pieces, was only $10!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      It’s frustrating to get rejections because often we’re not given a reason and end up learning nothing from the experience. The larger the contest the more impersonal it is and the less we seem to benefit from it.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. shoreacres Avatar

    I thought of you and this post this morning when I read this quotation from a book about the painter Mary Cassatt on another blog:

    “With the exception of a brief return to Philadelphia in 1870, during the Franco-Prussian War, Cassatt remained in Europe for the remainder of her life, settling permanently in Paris in 1875. Two years later, she became the only American artist to join the French Impressionist group at the invitation of her close friend, Edgar Degas. She later recalled, “I accepted with joy. At last I could work without considering the opinion of a jury. I had already recognized who were my true masters. I admired Monet, Courbet, and Degas. I hated conventional art. I had begun to live life.”

    Like

    1. Alessandra Chaves Avatar

      Thanks for that!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

Discover more from It is all about the light

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading