Some thoughts on when, and why, ask for photography critique

On a previous post, I wrote tips about how a photographer can ask for critique and be more likely to receive meaningful feedback. 

Although critique is fundamental to becoming a better photographer, it is important to keep in mind that constantly letting others tell you what to do and how to do it may not be desirable.  


You ask for critique when you want to learn what other people see when they look at your work. It is like asking someone to read a text you just wrote: you know exactly what you want to say, but someone else may not be able to understand it. If that’s the case, you go back and rephrase things, then ask again, “do you now understand this text?”

Another person may see something you missed in a photograph. For example, a week ago, a wannabe wedding photographer posted the photo of a marriage proposal in a critique group. The first thing I saw jumping at me was a trashcan coming out of the head of one of the two subjects. The photographer needed a lot of encouragement to finally see the trashcan (red!). There is value in having as many pairs of eyes as possible on your work, particularly if you are new and want to break into an industry. Conversely, if you are a seasoned photographer, your self-confidence might occlude your own ability to see undesirable elements in a photograph.

With the above considerations in mind, I must say that there are also reasons not to ask for critique. This brings me to the second question. 

WHEN is it NOT appropriate to ASK FOR INPUT?    

Sometimes, particularly as part of the artistic process involving creative vision, asking for input is not productive. Having a vision for a photograph, or a group of photographs, is knowing exactly how you want your work to look like. When it’s finished, you ask yourself: “is this consistent with my vision?”. If it is, you keep it. If it is not, you start over. If you believe that it is important to stay 100% true to your vision, then the only critique you will ever need is your own. 

Now, how does critique interfere with your creativity and vision? If you are constantly asking for and listening to input, you will get confused. For example, a while ago I posted the lead photo somewhere and someone said that I should add grain. Given that the comment was out, I had no other choice but to consider adding some grain to see how it looks like. Someone questioned my vision and I started questioning it too. Of course, this is not something to lament and it’s certainly not the end of the world, but too much of it can impair one’s creativity.

Trying to keep others from interfering with one’s own vision is the reason why some photographers absolutely don’t look at other people’s photos and do not ask for critique. Completely eliminating outside input is a means to strengthen one’s own vision, and fast, and ensure that you stay 100% true to it. 


Hiring a mentor you admire and trust is a great way to improve your photography through critique, without having to deal with random comments from people who either don’t know what they are talking about, or do not take your vision into consideration when they weight in. Furthermore, when you establish a student-teacher relationship with someone, you are in a better position to seriously consider the input you receive. Finding a competent mentor, however, is difficult, and it must be a person who will help you develop your own style and vision rather than trying to make you adopt his/hers.     


When someone says something about my artistic work, I have no choice but consider it, regardless of whether the input was requested or not. I ask myself, does this person have a point? I try not to get upset or discouraged and if it is something I agree with and I can change in a photograph, I will. However, I don’t often go about asking others’ opinions: too much input will make me abandon a project, or a photo, because I end up getting confused and losing my inspiration.

When it comes to the industry, however, I often ask for and listen to input. For example, in 2020 I thought I wanted to become a food photographer and signed up for a workshop. I posted every picture I took in the workshops forum, and worked on all advice I received from the instructor. Sometimes I felt discouraged because nothing I did seemed to get 100% approval from her, but with time I felt that I no longer had a long list of things to address. Although I have since changed mind about becoming a food photographer, what I learned in that workshop from critique is invaluable and I can apply it to other fields of photography.

If you are a photographer, or another visual artist, where do you stand with regards to outside input? Do you think that it helps you, or that it impairs your vision?


The lead photograph is part of my Digital Images gallery on GeoGalleries, featuring sunflowers on a white texture. Making these images is a two-step process, in which I first photograph the flower on light grey background, then I apply a stone texture to it using photoshop layers.

If you are not familiar with adding texture to your photos, and would like to learn more about it, watch How To Apply Textures In Photoshop 2020, by fellow photographer Howard Grill.


Wall Art Botanical Images

Wall Art Photography projects

Wall Art landscapes and miscellaneous


Published by Alessandra Chaves

Photographer with a preference for nature photography in black and white and other abstractions.

14 thoughts on “Some thoughts on when, and why, ask for photography critique

  1. Wise words Alessandra. I’ve learned a great deal by having my photos critiqued. However I also know that even critiques are subjective. Some advice is best not taken when it misses your objective for the photo.


  2. The very act of posting photographs in a blog means that we’re hoping people will look at our work. A few bloggers have turned off the ability for viewers to comment on posts, but almost all blogs I’ve seen do allow comments, so there’s an implicit invitation for people to say things about the photographs. When I comment I normally say something I find favorable. Once in a while I offer a suggestion for change. In your sunflower picture you’ve added a gray border to keep the photograph’s white background from bleeding into the white of the surrounding (digital) mat. A couple of times I’ve suggested to people whose white backgrounds were bleeding into the surrounding white that they should similarly add a border of some sort to prevent the bleeding. A few times I’ve suggested to people that cropping a photograph to remove a distracting element might improve a picture.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. 👌👌👌✍️🌹I encounter critics quite often. You can already tell by their first sentence if they have any idea what they are talking about. I personally criticize the photographer’s work very little. For one simple reason. I wasn’t there when he took the photo. A good photographer who is aware of a shortcoming will not publish his work, or, on the contrary, will immediately draw attention to the “shortcoming” and tell the story of why it is so. Photography from the studio or arranged must be perfect.. technically and in terms of content. Everything else is just about the magic of the moment.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Very interesting and beautiful image to lead with. I love the positioning in the corner and I hadn’t really noticed that you showed it in a frame and mat, which is a great idea to contain the image and stop it just fading away to white until I read Steve’s comment. The story itself is also thoughtful, but I do believe that it is almost always worth asking for an opinion from someone you trust to tell the truth, whether you take that advice or not. A friend of mine had printed a very impressive water reflection of a small harbor on a metal print and when I saw it in the gallery I was convinced that someone had damaged the corner – there was a hard light-colored triangle in the bottom corner. On closer inspection it was the edge of the dock itself that he had left in the composition – by accident it appeared when we talked about it. In my mind, it ruined the salability of the print as who would want something that looked damaged? A second pair of eyes almost always sees something the photographer missed in their focus on the subject.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: